Society » Oh Baby!
The big birth rate debate is upon us once again and policy makers have looked abroad to their Swedish cousins for inspiration. What’s stopping the stork from taking roost and can new measures fix Singapore’s baby dearth?
BY CHERYL SHEN
Justina Soewarso knows how fortunate she is. After delivering her
first child Elias, the Singaporean – who is married to a Swede – is
enjoying a year’s maternity leave, including a two-and-a-half month
visit back to Singapore. “It’s thanks to the Swedish policies that we
can take a nice long holiday, and for Elias to spend some time with his
grandmother and cousins,” said Justina, 35, who lives in Sweden with her
husband Jan Sundström.
Generous Swedish policies include 480 days of shared parental leave
over eight years. Out of these 480 days, 80 per cent of the parent’s salary
is paid for by the Government, so parents can juggle time off according
to their economic advantage.
Hence if Dad makes more money, he might take more parental leave
and care for baby while mum works part time.
In Jan’s case, he took over four months of parental leave to be with
his family and first-born son.
It underscores the idea that parenting is a shared responsibility,
said the Sundströms. Another key policy of the Swedes – which has
been successful in helping mothers juggle family and career – is that its
government foots about two-thirds of childcare costs.
“It’s recognition that a child is a long-term investment and parents
need support for much more than one year,” said Jan.
No wonder then that these measures have boosted Sweden’s
fertility rate from 1.5 children per woman in 1999 to 1.71 in 2003. Last
year, it hit 1.88.
Although this is still below the ideal replacement rate of 2.1, it’s still
one of the highest in Europe.
|
Taking up the issue in July, Minister Mentor
Lee Kuan Yew cited the “Swedish way” as
an example of how a revamp of procreation
policies here might take shape. At his National
Day Rally speech in August, Prime Minister
Lee Hsien Loong announced a slew of
enhancements costing some $1.6 billion aimed
at improving the support at the various stages
of parenthood (see sidebar on Page 11). The most
prominent of all is four months of maternity
leave – up from three months – that will take
effect from 17 August, following protests from
mothers-to-be who cried foul over the original
kick-in date of January next year.
These changes come as the total fertility
rate here languishes at 1.29, way below
the replacement rate of 2.1 despite years
of concerted effort to shore up baby rates.
Singapore’s baby woes started to be apparent
in 1975 when the rate dropped below the
replacement level for the first time after the
popular “Stop at Two” campaign in 1972.
But the slide continued despite a reversal
on policies and the “Have Three If You Can
Afford It” campaign of 1987 – hitting a
record low of 1.26 in 2003. The next year, the
maternity leave was upped from 8 to 12 weeks,
with the government footing the extra four
weeks. The baby bonus too was improved,
giving parents $3,000 for the first and second
child and $6,000 for the third and fourth child.
|
Mother-of-two Genevieve Kwek set up her own PR firm so that she
could have a better work-life balance.
|
Going by a Ministry of Community
Development, Youth and Sports (MCYS)
survey, these measures have helped, said Mr
Lim Soon Hock, a member of the National
Family Council, as they have created a
friendlier environment for having and raising
children. National University of Singapore
sociologist Paulin Straughan told The Straits
Times (ST) that there is a relationship between
these policies and the desire to start a family
because policies send an “important signal”
that having children is socially valuable. But
still, such policies only speak to those already
planning to have families, she added
Agreeing, Keith Tan, 29, said no government
incentive would compel him and his fiancée to
have children. “Even if there is a penalty, I would
pay it,” he said, “If someone is not keen or ready
to be a parent, do you really want to ‘force’
them to be one?” Marriage and having a family
boil down to personal decision, he added.
The complex confluence of factors –
conflicting priorities, personal choice, work
pressures and other societal issues, means the
solutions must be just as multi-faceted, said
Genevieve Kwek, 36, a mother of two. “It’s a
mix of many variables,” she said, adding that
while baby bonuses, maternity leave, and tax
incentives are good, they must also be met
with support from society and employers, as
well as a pro-family environment.
Addressing the disappointment among some that
the new policies simply built on existing policies and
were not as radical as expected, Mdm Halimah said it
achieved a happy balance, as the cost of generous family
policies in countries like Sweden come at the expense of
tax payers.
What is more important, she said, is that it gives women
choices, allowing them to have their careers and a family. Previously, it
was all or nothing, she noted, “If you cannot cope, then you quit your job
to be a mum. Or if you care for your job then you sacrifice parenthood.”
But the package could also have been “more generous”, with more
incentives for flexible work hours, and do more for homemakers, she
acknowledged. “It would have been good to give mothers who are not working
some cash incentives and recognise the sacrifices that they have made,” she said.
The success of any procreation drive, however, depends on a society’s values.
Said Genevieve: “The whole society – government, employers and people –
must be open to creating an environment that is pro-family. We must reassess
our pursuit of excellence-at-all-costs mindset. We have to question what really
matters to us as individuals and as a society.”
|
One major societal problem, she pointed out,
is the workplace. While singles cite long work
hours and the pressures to put work before
family, mothers face even greater pressures.
Genevieve herself had wanted to continue
part-time working arrangements after
the birth of her first child, but her former
employer was cool to the idea. She quit, and
now runs her own public relations firm. “It
gives me more flexibility to spend time with
my family.”
The government’s commitment to foot the
bill of an extra four weeks of maternity leave
has been welcomed as a significant move. But
even now, some mums on maternity leave have
fears over job security. Said Genevieve, “Some
mums are discriminated against, passed over
for promotions and feel pressured to stay late
at work.”
|
Singaporean Justina Soewarso, who
is married to Swede Jan Sundström, is enjoying a year’s maternity leave after
delivering Elias in Sweden.
|
It has come to a stage that media reports
have highlighted how some women do not take
the full 12 weeks of maternity leave, preferring
to take no-pay leave instead.
In 2007, 72 pregnant women complained
to the Ministry of Manpower (MOM) of
being unfairly dismissed because they were
expecting. The good news is that it’s a drop
from 85 in 2006 and 78 in 2005 – but the
problem is real and it’s evident that companies,
especially smaller ones, feel the pinch more
when it comes to their female staff taking time
off to have kids, Mr Tan Soo Jin, director of
Amrop Hever Group told ST.
Having kids may also slow a mother’s
climb up the corporate ladder. Ms Whang
Soo Ann, 29, told ST, “With three months’
maternity leave, morning sickness and
numerous medical certificates, a mum will be
less productive than a peer who is free of the
above.”
Top sales manager Ms Lau Li Nah was six
months pregnant when she was sacked. She
told ST that she believed it was because the company did not want to foot the
maternity leave bill.
MNCs too can be guilty of discrimination. In another case, 34-year old
Ms Ngian Hui Chyi, who was a personal assistant at an MNC, had her job
replaced, despite reassurances by her company, while she was on away on
maternity leave.
But thanks to recently announced policies, firms who retrench them
in the last three months of their pregnancy, or dismiss them unfairly in
the last six months, will still have to pay maternity leave benefits.
MP Halimah Yacob, deputy secretary general of NTUC, who has long
been advocating improved workplace protection for expectant mothers,
was “very pleased” with the extension. She told Singapore : “Previously the
law only covers unfair dismissal in the last three months. It’s not right.”
But an ST report found that many of the 20 SMEs and prominent
business groups polled were worried that the extension on
maternity leave would add to rising business costs.
“You find someone, train that person up and then have to
make the decision whether this person has to go or stay when
the pregnant employee returns,” Mr Sean Teo, founder of
Transmex Systems, told ST.
This underscores the need for more than just mere
policies, said Mdm Hailimah, who stressed the need for
society to see maternity leave “not as an exception
but as a norm.”
Already, some enlightened employers are
embracing pro-family policies to good ends. At
UBS Singapore, employees get $300 for each
newborn child and the primary care-giver in
the family gets 15 weeks of paid parental
leave, said ST. These measures have built a
loyal workforce with staff turnover ratio of
10 per cent – below the industry average.
For SP Consulting International
– an SME with eight employees –
telecommuting has been a core strategy. In
addition, the consultancy converted some
office space into a family room so staff
could bring their children to work. Within a
year, it saw a 12 per cent jump in quota-based
revenue generation.
- Maternity leave has been extended to 16 weeks, up from 12 weeks. The last eight weeks can be taken flexibly till the child turns one.
- Each parent will enjoy six days of paid childcare leave, up from two days a year, till their child turns six. Either parent can also enjoy unpaid infant care leave of six days a year for children under two years old.
- Pregnant women can get maternity benefits if they are dismissed without sufficient cause within the last six months of pregnancy. Previously, they could seek redress only if they were fired in the last three months. In addition, those retrenched in the last three months of her pregnancy can also claim maternity benefits.
- The cash gift for babies will go up to $4,000 for the first two children, up from $3,000. The cash gift remains at $6,000 for the third and fourth kid.
- Parents can claim $4,000, instead of $2,000 in relief for children under 16.
- The tax relief for a handicapped child has also gone up to $5,500, up from $3,500.
- Working mums can also claim 15 per cent for first child (up from 5 per cent), 20 per cent for second child (up from 15 per cent) and 25 per cent for third child and any subsequent children. Parents can claim a total of $50,000 for each child per year, twice the amount previously.
- In a major turnaround, the Government will co-fund half of invitro fertilisation (IVF) treatment at public hospitals (capped at $3,000 and three fresh cycles of Assisted Reproduction Technology procedures
Email a friend
|